Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Marchant

Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Marchant, 282 U.S. 808 (1930)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1930-12-08
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Central Union Telephone Co. v. City of Edwardsville, 269 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Marchant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Central Union Telephone Co. v. City of Edwardsville, 269 U. S. 190, 195; Beaty v. Richardson, 276 U. S. 599.