Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bunger v. Green River
Bunger v. Green River, 300 U.S. 638 (1937)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1937-03-01
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bunger v. Green River. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U. S. 359, 363; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79. (2) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 81 ; Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U. S. 157, 160; Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 73. (3) Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S. 251, 254, 255; Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 525; Hartford Indemnity Co. v. Illinois, 298 U. S. 155, 158.