Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Connard
State v. Connard, 319 N.C. 392 (N.C. 1987)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1987-04-07
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- "It is sufficient if the verdict can be properly understood by referenceto the indictment, evidence and jury instructions."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Connard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 15 opinions
*393 PER CURIAM.
At trial defendant in case number 85CRS8429 was convicted and sentenced for the felonious possession of stolen property, a violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-71.1. The Court of Appeals, after concluding that certain evidence offered against defendant in this case was the product of an unconstitutional search and seizure and that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress this evidence, ordered a new trial.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is
Affirmed.
Justice Webb did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.