Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

BISHOP v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 328 N.C. 325 (1991)

MARGARET Y. BISHOP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE v. N.C. DEPARTMENTOF Hum. Res., O'BERRY Ctr., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 401 S.E.2d 366 (N.C. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1991-01-01
Topic
general

BISHOP v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 328 N.C. 325 (1991) 401 S.E.2d 366 MARGARET Y. BISHOP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BISHOP v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 328 N.C. 325 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BISHOP v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES,328 N.C. 325(1991)
401 S.E.2d 366
MARGARET Y. BISHOP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF HUMAN RESOURCES, O'BERRY CENTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
No. 465PA90
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed 7 March 1991
ON discretionary review of a unanimous decision by the Court of Appeals,100 N.C. App. 175,394 S.E.2d 702(1990), affirming an order entered 12 May 1989 by Phillips, J., in Superior Court, WAYNE County. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 1991.
Eastern Carolina Legal Services, Inc., by Wesley Abney, for petitioner-appellee.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Valerie B. Spalding, Associate Attorney General, for respondent-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
Having reviewed the record and briefs and heard argument, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review filed by the North Carolina Department of Human Resources, O'Berry Center, was improvidently allowed.

Discretionary review improvidently allowed.Page 326