Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 210 (2001)
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 355 N.C. 210 (2001), 559 S.E.2d 796 (N.C. 2001)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 2001-01-01
- Topic
- general
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 210 (2001) 559 S.E.2d 796Supreme Court of North Carolina 2001 AMERICAN RIPENER CO. v. TOLSON No. 674P01 Case below: 147 N.C. App. ___ (6 November 2001) Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31 denied 31 January 2002. ARCHER v. ROCKINGHAM CTY.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 210 (2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,355 N.C. 210(2001)
559 S.E.2d 796
Supreme Court of North Carolina
2001
No. 674P01
Case below: 147 N.C. App. ___ (6 November 2001)
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 31 January 2002.
ARCHER v. ROCKINGHAM CTY.
No. 480P01
Case below:144 N.C. App. 550
Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 31 January 2002. Justice Edmunds recused.
ASHTON v. CITY OF CONCORD
No. 430A01
Case below:144 N.C. App. 722
Motion by defendant to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 31 January 2002.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSE AUTH. v. BRUTON
No. 475P01
Case below:145 N.C. App. 190
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 31 January 2002.
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ROADWAYS v. N.C. DEP'T OF TRANSP.
No. 540P01
Case below:145 N.C. App. 497
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. C7A-31denied 31 January 2002.Page 211