Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 352 (2002)
562 S.E.2d 427
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 2002-01-01
- Topic
- general
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 352 (2002) 562 S.E.2d 427Supreme Court of North Carolina 2002 STATE v. McNEILL No. 105A02 Case below: 148 N.C. App. ___ (5 February 2002) Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 4 April 2002. STATE v. MOSELEY No. 385A92-4 Case below: Forsyth County Superior Court Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the orders of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, denied 4 April 2002.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 352 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,355 N.C. 352(2002)
562 S.E.2d 427
Supreme Court of North Carolina
2002
No. 105A02
Case below: 148 N.C. App. ___ (5 February 2002)
Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S.7A-30(substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 4 April 2002.
STATE v. MOSELEY
No. 385A92-4
Case below: Forsyth County Superior Court
Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the orders of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, denied 4 April 2002.
STATE v. PARKER
No. 594P01
Case below:138 N.C. App. 555
Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals dismissed 4 April 2002.
STATE v. SAMS
No. 60P02
Case below: 148 N.C. App. ___ (28 December 2001)
Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 April 2002. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 April 2002.
STATE v. SPENCER
No. 683A01
Case below: 147 N.C. App. ___ (20 November 2001)
Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 April 2002.Page 353