Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
In re Roberts
In re Roberts, 356 N.C. 660 (N.C. 2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2003-02-28
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED; APPEAL DISMISSED EX MERO MOTU.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Roberts. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
IN RE ROBERTS,356 N.C. 660(2003)
IN THE MATTER OF: NICHOLAS R. ROBERTS and the BUNCOMBE COUNTY
BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-31and on appeal of right of a constitutional question pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(1) to review a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals,150 N.C. App. 86,563 S.E.2d 37(2002), affirming an amended order entered 29 January 2001 by Judge C. Walter Allen in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 5 February 2003.
Paul Louis Bidwell for petitioner-appellee.Root Root, P.L.L.C., by Allan P. Root, for respondent-appellantBuncombe County Board of Education.Tharrington Smith, L.L.P., by Ann Majestic and Carolyn A. Waller, onbehalf of the North Carolina School Boards Association, amicus curiae.Jane R. Wettach and Brenda Berlin, on behalf of the Children'sEducation Law Clinic, The American Civil Liberties Union Legal Foundationof North Carolina, Inc., The North Carolina Justice and CommunityDevelopment Center, The North Carolina Child Advocacy Institute, LegalAid of North Carolina, Inc., The Council for Children, The Children's LawCenter, Legal Services of the Southern Piedmont, The Child AdvocacyCommission of Durham, North Carolina Central University School of LawJuvenile Law Clinic, The North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, TheNorth Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED; APPEAL DISMISSED EX MERO MOTU.Page 661