Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

GUILLORY v. JOHNSON, 256 La. 898 (1970)

CLINTON GUILLORY & LAVERNE W. GUILLORY INDIVIDUALLY & ASADMINISTRATORS OF THE Est. OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, CHAUNCEY GUILLORY v.ONEDIA F. JOHNSON & STATE FARM Mut. Auto. Ins. COMPANY., 240 So. 2d 233 (La. 1970)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1970-10-23
Topic: general

GUILLORY v. JOHNSON, 256 La. 898 (1970) 240 So.2d 233 CLINTON GUILLORY AND LAVERNE WEST GUILLORY INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, CHAUNCEY GUILLORY v.ONEDIA F. JOHNSON AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 50888.Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 23, 1970.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GUILLORY v. JOHNSON, 256 La. 898 (1970). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GUILLORY v. JOHNSON,256 La. 898(1970)

240 So.2d 233

CLINTON GUILLORY AND LAVERNE WEST GUILLORY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, CHAUNCEY GUILLORY v.

ONEDIA F. JOHNSON AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50888.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 23, 1970.

IN RE: CLINTON GUILLORY (AND WIFE, ON BEHALF OF CHAUNCEY GUILLORY) APPLYING FOR CERTIORARI, OR WRIT OF REVIEW, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EVANGELINE.

[1] Writ refused. The case presents only factual questions, which were found adversely to applicants in the trial and appellate courts.