Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

EUBANKS v. STATE, 320 So.2d 861 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1975)

RICHARD EUBANKS, A/K/A RICK EUBANKS, & FREDDIE EUBANKS, A/K/A JIM EUBANKS,APPELLANTS (DEFENDANTS), v. STATE OF Fla., APPELLEE (STATE)., 320 So. 2d 861 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1975-10-23
Topic: general

EUBANKS v. STATE, 320 So.2d 861 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1975) RICHARD EUBANKS, A/K/A RICK EUBANKS, AND FREDDIE EUBANKS, A/K/A JIM EUBANKS,APPELLANTS (DEFENDANTS), v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE). No. Y-253.District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EUBANKS v. STATE, 320 So.2d 861 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1975). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EUBANKS v. STATE,320 So.2d 861(Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1975)

RICHARD EUBANKS, A/K/A RICK EUBANKS, AND FREDDIE EUBANKS, A/K/A JIM EUBANKS,

APPELLANTS (DEFENDANTS), v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE).

No. Y-253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 1975.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Henry F. Martin, Judge.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs and record on appeal, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

BOYER, C.J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.