Opinion · Alabama Court Opinions

UNION PLANTERS BANK v. WATSON, 794 So.2d 1094 (Ala. 2001)

Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Clyde R. Watson, 794 So. 2d 1094 (Ala. 2001)

Type
Opinion
Court
Alabama Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Alabama
Date
2001-04-06
Topic
general

UNION PLANTERS BANK v. WATSON, 794 So.2d 1094 (Ala. 2001) Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Clyde R. Watson et al. No. 1990244.Supreme Court of Alabama.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed UNION PLANTERS BANK v. WATSON, 794 So.2d 1094 (Ala. 2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

UNION PLANTERS BANK v. WATSON,794 So.2d 1094(Ala. 2001)
Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Clyde R. Watson et al.
No. 1990244.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Decided April 6, 2001.
Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court (CV-98-2453).
William H. Hardie of Johnstone, Adams, Bailey, Gordon Harris, L.L.C., Mobile; and Henry E. Simpson and Laurence J. McDuff of Lange, Simpson, Robinson Somerville, L.L.P., Birmingham, for appellant.

Steven L. Nicholas and Steve Olen of Olen Nicholas, P.C., Mobile; and David G. Wirtes and Richard T. Dorman of Cunningham, Bounds, Yance, Crowder Brown, L.L.C., Mobile, for appellees.
On Application for Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
The application for rehearing is granted. The opinion released on December 15, 2000, is withdrawn, and the judgment is affirmed without opinion. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (2)(F), Ala.R.App.P.

APPLICATION GRANTED; OPINION OF DECEMBER 15, 2000, WITHDRAWN; AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION.

Moore, C.J., and Houston, See, Lyons, Johnstone, Harwood, Woodall, and Stuart, JJ., concur.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1095

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1096

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1097

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1098

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1099

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1100

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1101

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1102

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1103

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1104

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1105

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1106

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1107

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION ORIGINALLY APPEARING ON THESE PAGES WAS WITHDRAWN AND WILL BE REPUBLISHED TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OPINION.]Page 1108