Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

SELINSKY v. SELINSKY, 99 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1957)

HERMAN SELINSKY, APPELLANT, v. ESTHER ANSHEN SELINSKY, APPELLEE., 99 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 1957)

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1957-11-13
Topic: general

SELINSKY v. SELINSKY, 99 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1957) HERMAN SELINSKY, APPELLANT, v. ESTHER ANSHEN SELINSKY, APPELLEE.Supreme Court of Florida. November 13, 1957.Rehearing Denied December 18, 1957. Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Charles A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SELINSKY v. SELINSKY, 99 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1957). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SELINSKY v. SELINSKY,99 So.2d 563(Fla. 1957)

HERMAN SELINSKY, APPELLANT, v. ESTHER ANSHEN SELINSKY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 13, 1957.

Rehearing Denied December 18, 1957.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Charles A. Carroll, Judge.

Warren, Klein Moore, Miami Beach, and L.J. Cushman, Miami, for appellant.

Charles H. Wakeman, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed insofar as it pertains to the award of alimony, but is reversed insofar at it awards fees to the appellee's attorney for services rendered in the trial court, with leave to the appellee to reapply to the trial court for an award of such fees.

THOMAS, Acting C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.