Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Lessee of Fothergill v. Stover

Lessee of Fothergill v. Stover, 1 U.S. 6 (1763)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1763-04-01
Topic
general

Evidence. A letter from the secretary of the land-office to a deputy-surveyor, stating that James Logan had agreed that A should have 600 acres at C., and requesting him to survey it to A.; and a plot of survey made in pursuance thereof, not returned into office, but found among the papers of the deputy, after his death, admitted in evidence.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lessee of Fothergill v. Stover. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

APRIL TERM, 1763.

William Allen, Chief Justice, William Coleman, Justice.

The Lessee of Fothergill and others v. Christian Stover.

Evidence.

A letter from the secretary of the land-office to a deputy-surveyor, stating that James Logan had agreed that A should have 600 acres at C., and requesting him to survey it to A.; and a plot of survey made in pursuance thereof, not returned into office, but found among the papers of the deputy, after his death, admitted in evidence.

A Letter from James Steel, receiver-general and secretary of the land-office, to the surveyor-general’s deputy in Chester county, in these words . “ Friend Isaac Taylor. Philadelphia, 3d, 2nd mo., 1719. — James Logan has agreed that the bearer hereof, William Willis, shall have 500 acres of land at Conestogoe. Please to survey it to him, and the warrant shall be ready. —Thy loving friend, *James Steel,” offered to be given evidence at the foundation of the defendant’s title. Objected on the part of the plaintiff, that James Steel, by his order only, without a warrant from the proprietors, or the commissioners of property, could not authorize the location of lands; and even supposing it to amount to an order from James Logan himself, as he was only one of three commissioners, such order cannot be a sufficient warrant.

But the Court said, that under these sort of orders from the proprietor’s officers, a great part of the province had been settled, and mat for the general convenience they had been heretofore allowed to be given in evidence, and particularly in McLowell's case. In that case, last April term, a letter from Richard Peters, secretary of the land-office, to the same effect as the above, was allowed ; and the letter in this case was accordingly ruled to be given in evidence.

A plot of a survey, made in pursuance of the above letter, in Isaac Taylor’s own handwriting, with a note at the bottom thus, “ Sur. 9ber 10. 1720,” and in the body of it, the words “William Willis, 400 acres,” not returned into the surveyor-general’s or secretary’s office, but found among Isaac Taylor’s land papers, many years after his death, was allowed to be given in evidence, against a regular warrant and survey, ¡posterior to the above — a settlement and possession being proved to have been made — the first survey *9amounting to an impropriation, and the land-office appearing to have been shut between the years 1718 and 1732.

N. B. On an appeal to the King and Council, the judgment of the supreme court was affirmed, (a)