Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.

342 U.S. 35

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1951-11-05
Topic
labor-and-employment

Per Curiam. The Court is advised that, on May 26, 1951, the Oklahoma Legislature repealed Okla. Stat., 1941 (Cum. Supp. 1949), Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, the constitutionality of which is drawn in question by these appeals. The causes are therefore ordered/ continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect of this repeal on the matters raised in these appeals.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Palmer Oil Corp. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
PALMER OIL CORP.v. AMERADA CORP.,342 U.S. 35(1951)
PALMER OIL CORP. ET AL.v. AMERADA PETROLEUM CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.fn*
No. 301.
Continued November 5, 1951.
These causes are continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect on these appeals of the repeal of the state statute whose constitutionality is drawn in question by these appeals.
The decision below is reported in204 Okla. 543,
231 P.2d 997.
Coleman Hayes, Mark H. AdamsandCharles E. Jonesfor appellants in No. 301.Reford Bond, Jr. for appellants in No. 302.Harry D. Pagefor the Amerada Petroleum Corporation;Earl A. Brown, Robert W. RichardsandCharles B.Wallacefor the Magnolia Petroleum Co.;M. D. Kirkfor the Sunray Oil Corporation; andRayburn L. Foster,Harry TurnerandR. M. Williamsfor the Phillips Petroleum Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The Court is advised that, on May 26, 1951, the Oklahoma Legislature repealed Okla. Stat., 1941 (Cum. Supp. 1949), Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, the constitutionality of which is drawn in question by these appeals. The causes are therefore ordered continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect of this repeal on the matters raised in these appeals.Cause continued.Page 36
  1. Page 35 Together with No. 302,Farwell et al. v.Amerada Petroleum Corp.et al.,also on appeal from the same court. ↩