Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ex Parte Hitz

111 U.S. 766

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1884-05-05
Topic: general

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the ^.pinion of the court. He stated the facts in the foregoing language and continued: Precisely what the relations of Mr. Hitz to the United States were as' Political Agent of the Swiss Confederation we have not been advised, and on application to the Department of State, made on the suggestion of the court by the counsel in this proceeding, we are informed that the records of the department show nothing upon this subject except a letter from him under date of March,30th, 1868, enclosing his letter of credence, and soliciting an interview with the Secretary of State for its formal presentation; the answer of Secretary Seward according such an interview, and fixing the 2d of April as the time; and a letter from Secretary Fish to Mr. Hitz, under date of June 28th, 1870, informing him that he *768 (the Secretary) did not find in his relations to the United States-any ground for continuing the privilege to him of a free entry of goods imported for his use.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex Parte Hitz. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 25 opinions

Headnotes

Criminal Law & Procedure — Certiorari A writ of certiorari, when applied for by a defendant, is not a writ of right but is discretionary with the court. 111 U.S. 766, 767
Evidence — Immunity from Prosecution An application for certiorari by a person indicted for an offense committed while serving as an officer of a national bank, on the ground that he was a political agent of a foreign government when the offense was committed, is properly denied where the applicant's own government had requested his resignation before the indictment was found (though the resignation was not actually given until afterward) and where the political department of the United States government had refused him the privilege of free entry of goods usually accorded to a diplomatic representative. 111 U.S. 766, 767

EX PARTE HITZ,111 U.S. 766(1884)

4 S.Ct. 698

EX PARTE: HITZ, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL.

Argued March 4th, 5th, 1884.

Decided May 5th, 1884.

Certiorari — Diplomatic privilege. A writ of certiorari when applied for by a defendant is not a writ of right but discretionary with the court. On an application by a person indicted for an offence committed while president of a national bank against the provisions of § 5209 for certiorari to bring up the indictment on the ground that when the alleged offence was committed he was a political agent of a foreign government, the application was refused when it appeared that his own government had requested his resignation prior to the finding of the indictment, although it was not actually given till subsequent thereto, and that the political department of the Government of the United States had refused him the privilege of free entry of goods usually accorded to a diplomatic representative.

This was an application by Mr. John Hitz for a writ of certiorari commanding the Supreme Court of the District of ColumbiaPage 767to certify to this court an indictment and the proceedings thereunder against him in that court, on the ground that when the indictment was filed, and when the offences therein charged where committed, he was the diplomatic representative of the Swiss Confederation, duly accredited to and received and recognized by the United States, under the title of Political Agent. The indictment was filed on the 17th of June, 1881.

From the return which was made to the rule to show cause it appeared that the indictment was for an offence against the provisions of § 5209 of the Revised Statutes alleged to have been committed by Mr. Hitz while and as president of the German-American National Bank of Washington. It also appeared that he was for many years the Consul General of the Swiss Confederation within the United States, and that on the 28th of February, 1868, he was accredited to the United States by the same government as Political Agent. On the 30th of May, 1881, he was requested by the Swiss Confederation to resign both these offices, and this he did on the 15th of June. On the 20th of June his resignations were accepted.

Mr. O.D. BarrettandMr. Benjamin F. Butlerfor petitioner.Mr. R. Ross PerryandMr. A.S. Worthingtonopposing.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court. He stated the facts in the foregoing language and continued:

Precisely what the relations of Mr. Hitz to the United States were as Political Agent of the Swiss Confederation we have not been advised, and on application to the Department of State, made on the suggestion of the court by the counsel in this proceeding, we are informed that the records of the department show nothing upon this subject except a letter from him under date of March 30th, 1868, enclosing his letter of credence, and soliciting an interview with the Secretary of State for its formal presentation; the answer of Secretary Seward according such an interview, and fixing the 2d of April as the time; and a letter from Secretary Fish to Mr. Hitz, under date of June 28th, 1870, informing him that hePage 768(the Secretary) did not find in his relations to the United States any ground for continuing the privilege to him of a free entry of goods imported for his use.

Under these circumstances, as the writ of certiorari, when applied for by a defendant, is not a writ of right, but discretionary with the court (Bac. Ab. Certiorari A), we deny this application, leaving the parties to such remedies as they may be entitled to elsewhere, or under any other form of proceeding.Petition dismissed.