Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cherokee Nation v. Journeycake

Cherokee Nation v. Journeycake, 155 U.S. 196 (1894)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1894-11-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that under the 1867 Agreement the "Delawares became incorporated into the Cherokee Nation, and are members and citizens thereof[.]"
  • holding that under the 1867 Agreement “two independent bodies politic united and became one, the lesser, according to its terms, being merged into the greater.”
  • stating that “[tjhis case hinges on the status of the individual Delawares as members and citizens of the Cherokee Nation”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cherokee Nation v. Journeycake. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
60 opinions

Headnotes

  1. International Law — Effect on Tribal Membership and Property Rights Where a treaty provides that a tribe settling within another nation's country and abandoning its tribal organization, after paying into the national fund its proportionate share, "shall be incorporated into and ever after remain a part of the Cherokee nation, on equal terms in every respect with native citizens," the removed Indians are absorbed as individual members of the Cherokee Nation on terms of full equality with native citizens, not merely located as a distinct tribe within the reservation. 155 U.S. at 204–205 (construing Treaty of July 19, 1866, art. XV, 14 Stat. 799, 803)
  2. International Law — Construction of Agreements with Indian Tribes Where an agreement between the Cherokee Nation and the Delawares provided that, on fulfillment of stipulated payments, all registered members of the Delaware tribe "shall become members of the Cherokee Nation, with the same rights and immunities, and the same participation (and no other) in the national funds as native Cherokees," and that their children should "in all respects be regarded as native Cherokees," the registered Delawares became incorporated into the Cherokee Nation as members and citizens standing equal with native Cherokees in all rights arising from citizenship, and the clause concerning children was inserted to prevent any question as to their inheriting those rights, not to confer additional rights. 155 U.S. at 205–206
  3. Real Property Law — Tribal Lands as Common Property The lands of the Cherokee Nation, having been conveyed by patent to the Cherokees as a nation rather than in severalty, and declared by the Cherokee constitution to remain common property, belong to the Cherokee Nation as a nation; all who are recognized as members and citizens of that Nation are alike interested in and entitled to share in the profits and proceeds of those lands. 155 U.S. at 207–208
  4. International Law — "Rights and Immunities" Construed to Include Property Rights Although the terms "rights and immunities" are often used to describe only political rights, where the rights and interests the native Cherokees held in the reservation and outlet sprang solely from citizenship in the Cherokee Nation, a grant of equal rights as members of the Nation carries with it all rights springing from citizenship, including the right to share equally in the common lands and their proceeds. 155 U.S. at 208–209
  5. Contracts Law — Consideration Where the value of the lands in question is uncertain and the consideration paid by the removed tribe was not shown to be grossly inadequate, a court will not set aside or reconstruct an agreement on the ground of inadequacy of consideration; the contract must be interpreted according to the plain import of the language the parties used, placing the court in the circumstances of the parties at the time, with their surroundings and expectations. 155 U.S. at 209–212
  6. Contracts Law — Interpretation The consistent action of the parties in performing a contract — here, the Cherokee Nation's equal per capita distribution of funds to native Cherokees and incorporated Delawares, and the Principal Chief's veto of legislation excluding the Delawares on the ground that it violated the agreement — is a practical interpretation by the parties of the contract they made and is significant in determining its meaning. 155 U.S. at 212–213