Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

TRAUTWEIN v. COM. REDEV. AGENCY, 379 U.S. 28 (1964)

TRAUTWEIN v. Cmty. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES., 379 U.S. 28 (1964)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-11-09
Topic
general

TRAUTWEIN v. COM. REDEV. AGENCY, 379 U.S. 28 (1964) TRAUTWEIN ET AL. v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TRAUTWEIN v. COM. REDEV. AGENCY, 379 U.S. 28 (1964). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TRAUTWEINv. COM. REDEV. AGENCY,379 U.S. 28(1964)
TRAUTWEIN ET AL.v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 416.
Decided November 9, 1964.fn*
Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below:61 Cal.2d 21,389 P.2d 538.
Frank Wickhemfor appellants in No. 416.

Appellantspro sein No. 426.Henry O. Duquefor appellee in both cases.Austin Clappfor John Swigart et al., asamici curiae, in support of appellants in No. 426.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of John Swigart et al., for leave to file a brief asamici curiaein No. 426 is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
  1. Page 28 Together with No. 426,Goldman et ux. v.Community RedevelopmentAgency of Los Angeles,also on appeal from the same court. ↩