Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Adams v. United States

Adams v. United States, 474 U.S. 971 (1985)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-11-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • White, J., joined by Burger, C.J., dissenting from a denial of certiorari in a recent RICO conspiracy case
  • a Sec. 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts
  • a § 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts
  • "the decision to grant immunity is reserved to the discretion of the executive branch."
  • count of indictment sufficient although it did not identify specific drug
  • “Even if [allegedly newly discovered] evidence could convince the jury to disregard ... [the] testimony [of a particular prosecution witness] ..., the other evidence in the case was more than sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt.”
  • court limited cross-examination of witness in the Witness Protection Program
  • examining the "context of the entire trial"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Adams v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
101 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.