Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co.

Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co., 498 U.S. 853 (1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-10-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding no error where a witness merely described her personal observations concerning the emotions of the victim during their counseling sessions
  • distinguishing casual encounter between police officer and college student from “the kind of association to which a specially protected constitutional right” might attach
  • “[I]t is well-established that a savings clause ... does not ‘save’ common law actions that would subvert a federal statutory or regulatory scheme.”
  • "Indeed, a taxpayer who owes back taxes for several years may pay interest on and sue with respect to only one of them.”
  • the question of express preemption is properly analyzed only after consideration of both Sections 1392(d) and 1397(k)
  • associations for purposes other than expression are more properly viewed as stemming from the Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process rather than from the First Amendment
  • a common law rule cannot prohibit the exercise of a federally granted option
  • the right of intimate association is not protected by the first amendment

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
114 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.