Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Audinot v. United States

Audinot v. United States, 498 U.S. 866 (1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-10-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause may be triggered when a “civil penalty ... rose to the level of criminal punishment because of the lack of rational relation to the Government’s loss”
  • assessment of $1,791,100 in civil penalties based upon same conduct as criminal proceedings in civil action for filing false medicare claims remanded to the district court for a Halper analysis
  • order of proceedings, civil and criminal, does not effect double jeopardy application
  • the Halper principle applies whether civil penalty or criminal punishment comes first

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Audinot v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
21 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.