Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pierre v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Pierre v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins., 502 U.S. 973 (1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-11-18
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • "Federal courts owe due deference to an administrator's factual conclusions that reflect a reasonable and impartial judgment."
  • administrator’s factual determinations receive deferential review despite absence of plan language conferring discretionary authority
  • “Federal courts owe due deference to an administrator’s factual con elusions that reflect a reasonable and impartial judgment.”
  • Justice White, dissenting from the denial of certiorari

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pierre v. Connecticut General Life Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
100 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.