Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Johnson v. State Farm General Insurance

Johnson v. State Farm Gen. Ins., 512 U.S. 1209 (1994)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-06-13
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • declining to use Mount Healthy analysis in retaliatory transfer case and applying the more stringent “but for” test; “prisoner must prove that retaliation was the actual motivating factor for the transfer.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Johnson v. State Farm General Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
35 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.