Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Grantwood Vill. v. Mo. Pac. R.R., 519 U.S. 1149 (1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-02-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that National Guard and Reserve Service require only 15 and 14 days, respectively, of active duty training each year
  • “[Njothing in the language of § 3730 suggests that its protections are limited to those who were motivated by it”
  • finding it not “self-evident that the police offend general fourth-amendment principles when they allow members of the news media to enter someone’s house during the execution of a search warrant”
  • “FLSA case law is clear that the employer bears the burden of demonstrating its right to an exemption"
  • federal law and regulations exist that preempt questions of railroad abandonment of the Carondelet Branch
  • retaliatory discharge is a clearly established First Amendment violation

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
62 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.