Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Randall Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights

Randall Ricci v. Vill. of Arlington Heights, 523 U.S. 613 (1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-05-18
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • argument not raised in brief is waived

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Randall Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
RICCI v. VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS,523 U.S. 613(1998)
118 S.Ct. 1693
RICCIv. VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-501
Argued April 21, 1998
Decided May 4, 1998
Kenneth N. Flaxmanargued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.David A. Straussargued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief wasJeffrey Edward Kehl.Patricia A. Millettargued the cause for the United States asamicus curiaeurging affirmance. With her on the brief wereSolicitor General Waxman, Acting AssistantAttorney General Keeney, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, andWilliam C. Brown.fn*
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.Page 614
  1. Briefs ofamici curiaeurging reversal were filed for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. bySusan N.Herman,Steven R. Shapiro, Harvey Grossman, andStephen J. Schulhofer; for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., byWayne W. Schmidt, James P. Manak, andBernard J. Farber; and for the Institute for Justice byWilliam H. Mellor, Clint Bolick, andScott G. Bullock.Richard RudaandJames I. Crowleyfiled a brief for the National League of Cities et al. asamici curiaeurging affirmance.William J. MertensandBarbara Bergmanfiled a brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers asamicuscuriae. ↩