Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Burgess v. United States District Court

Burgess v. United States Dist. Court, 549 U.S. 1114 (2007)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2007-01-08
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • applying the limitation, but noting that courts have been exceedingly lenient in defining what is reasonable
  • “rejecting the view that a plaintiff does not state a claim actionable under § 1983 unless he satisfies the requirements of an analogous common law tort”
  • “[t]he proper remedy in a fraudulent conveyance claim is to rescind, or set aside, the allegedly fraudulent transfer, and cause the transferee to return the transferred property to the trans-feror.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Burgess v. United States District Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
15 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.