Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Haste v. American Home Products Corp.

Haste v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 439 U.S. 955 (1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-11-06
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • concluding that Model Rules protect information imparted by a prospective client even if the representation is declined
  • manufacturer satisfied duty by warning prescribing veterinarian of health risks to animats vaccinated by their owners with its prescription vaccine
  • attorney-client relationship does not arise only in agency manner, but also where layperson submits confidential information to lawyer with reasonable belief that latter is former’s attorney
  • “fiduciary relationship existing between lawyer and client extends to preliminary consultation by a prospective client with a view to retention of the lawyer, although actual employment does not result”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Haste v. American Home Products Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
151 opinions

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.