Opinion · Wisconsin Supreme Court
Weiland v. Paulin
260 Wis. 2d 277
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Wisconsin Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Wisconsin
- Date
- 2003-04-24
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- finding that “retroactive cancellation” of insurance policy by landlord was “contrary to public policy” and ineffective because “the rights of the parties become fixed when the loss occurs” in dispute between insurers of landlord and tenant
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Weiland v. Paulin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
WEILAND v. PAULIN,2003 WI 27
260 Wis.2d 277,659 N.W.2d 875
Gerald F. Weiland and Carol Ann Weiland, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Daniel
G. Paulin and Joan E. Paulin, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
No. 02-0826.
Opinion Filed: April 24, 2003.
Upon consideration of the petition for review filed in this matter by Attorney Joseph J. Kroening challengingPage 278that portion of the court of appeals' November 13, 2002 decision that, on the court's own motion, declared that the appeal Attorney Kroening filed on behalf of the defendants-appellants-petitioners, Daniel and Joan Paulin, was frivolous under Wis. Stat. § (Rule)809.25(3)(c)2 and directed that costs and fees for the frivolous appeal be assessed solely against Attorney Kroening,
IT IS ORDERED the petition for review is granted and that part of the court of appeals' decision declaring the appeal to be frivolous is summarily reversed and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals with directions that: (1) the court of appeals shall give Attorney Kroening an opportunity to be heard regarding the frivolous appeal determination, and (2) the court of appeals shall then make specific findings to support any conclusion that the appeal is frivolous under Wis. Stat. § (Rule)809.25(3)(c)2.Page 279