Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
STATE v. BELL, 117 Wn. App. 1054 (2003)
STATE OF Wash., Respondent, v. RODNEY RAY BELL, Appellant.In the Matter of the Pers. Restraint of RODNEY RAY BELL, Petitioner., 117 Wash. App. 1054 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 2003-07-08
- Topic
- general
STATE v. BELL, 117 Wn. App. 1054 (2003) THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RODNEY RAY BELL, Appellant.In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of RODNEY RAY BELL, Petitioner. Nos. 27094-3-II; 27693-3-II.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. BELL, 117 Wn. App. 1054 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. BELL,117 Wn. App. 1054(2003)
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,Respondent,v. RODNEY RAY BELL,Appellant.
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint ofRODNEY RAY BELL,Petitioner.
Nos. 27094-3-II; 27693-3-II.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
July 8, 2003.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 00-1-01174-9, James E. Warme and Stephen M. Warning, JJ., entered May 9, 2003, together with a petition for relief from personal restraint.
Judgmentaffirmedand petitiondeniedby unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan, J., and Ladley, J. Pro Tem.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩