Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
PATTERSON v. JONES, 71 Wn. App. 1014 (1993)
MICHAEL PATTERSON, Respondent, v. TIM D. JONES, ET AL, Defendants, BLAZECONSTRUCTION Co., Appellant.MICHAEL PATTERSON, Respondent, v. JOHN D. SEALS, ET AL, Defendants,BLAZE Constr. Co., Appellant., 71 Wash. App. 1014 (Wash. Ct. App. 1993)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1993-08-30
- Topic
- general
PATTERSON v. JONES, 71 Wn. App. 1014 (1993) MICHAEL PATTERSON, Respondent, v. TIM D. JONES, ET AL, Defendants, BLAZECONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.MICHAEL PATTERSON, Respondent, v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PATTERSON v. JONES, 71 Wn. App. 1014 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PATTERSON v. JONES,71 Wn. App. 1014(1993)
MICHAEL PATTERSON,Respondent,v. TIM D. JONES, ET AL,Defendants,BLAZE
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,Appellant.
MICHAEL PATTERSON,Respondent,v. JOHN D. SEALS, ET AL,Defendants,
BLAZE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,Appellant.
No. 30154-3-I.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
August 30, 1993.
UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 90-2-07838-8, 90-2-09440-5, Norman W. Quinn, J., entered November 15, 1991, and February 25, 1992.
Affirmedby unpublished opinion per Webster, C.J., concurred in by Scholfield, J., and Sweeney, J. Pro Tem.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩