Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
HAYDEN v. ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO., 95 Wn. App. 1012 (1999)
DENNIS HAYDEN, ET AL., Appellants, v. Mut. OF ENUMCLAWINSURANCE Co., Respondent., 95 Wash. App. 1012 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1999-04-15
- Topic
- general
HAYDEN v. ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO., 95 Wn. App. 1012 (1999) DENNIS HAYDEN, ET AL., Appellants, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAWINSURANCE Co., Respondent. No. 17579-1-III.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed HAYDEN v. ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO., 95 Wn. App. 1012 (1999). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
HAYDEN v. ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO.,95 Wn. App. 1012(1999)
DENNIS HAYDEN, ET AL.,Appellants, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW
INSURANCE Co.,Respondent.
No. 17579-1-III.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
April 15, 1999.
UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 96-2-00200-2, Robert N. Hackett, Jr., J., entered May 13, 1998.
Affirmedby unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Kurtz, A.C.J., and Sweeney J.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩