DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 101 Wn.2d 1013 (1983)The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Thorkelson, Petitioner, No. 50359-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 6, 1984, 36 Wn. App. 1066.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 101 Wn.2d 1013 (1983). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,101 Wn.2d 1013(1983)
The Supreme Court of Washington.
State, Respondent, v. Thorkelson, Petitioner, No. 50359-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 6, 1984,36 Wn. App. 1066.DeniedApril 20, 1984.State, Respondent, v. Taplin, Petitioner, No. 50362-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, January 9, 1984,36 Wn. App. 664.DeniedApril 20, 1984.State, Respondent, v. Hightower, Petitioner, No. 50365-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, January 23, 1984,36 Wn. App. 536.DeniedApril 20, 1984.State, Respondent, v. Mitchell, Petitioner, No. 50386-9. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 27, 1984,36 Wn. App. 1074.DeniedApril 20, 1984.State, Respondent, v. Heaps, Petitioner, No. 50387-7. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 21, 1984,36 Wn. App. 718.DeniedApril 20, 1984.State, Respondent, v. Ultican, Petitioner. State, Respondent,v. Pierre, Petitioner, No. 50388-5. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 21, 1984,36 Wn. App. 1071.DeniedApril 20, 1984.Van Dyke, et al, Petitioners, v. Everest, et al, Respondents, No. 50389-3. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 21, 1984,36 Wn. App. 1071.DeniedApril 20, 1984.Hess, Petitioner, v. County of Pierce, et al, Respondents, No. 50371-1. Petition for review of a decision of the CourtPage 1014of Appeals, January 23, 1984,36 Wn. App. 1055.DeniedApril 20, 1984.