Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Affiliated Capital Corporation, Etc. v. City of Houston, Gulf Coast Cable Television and James J. McConn

Affiliated Cap. Corp., Etc. v. City of Hous., Gulf Coast Cable Television & James J. McConn, 714 F.2d 25 (5th Cir. 1983)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1983-08-23
Topic: capital-markets-and-corporate-governance

BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Affiliated Capital Corporation, Etc. v. City of Houston, Gulf Coast Cable Television and James J. McConn. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

AFFILIATED CAPITAL CORP. v. CITY OF HOUSTON,714 F.2d 25(5th Cir. 1983)

AFFILIATED CAPITAL CORPORATION, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF

HOUSTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, GULF COAST CABLE TELEVISION AND JAMES J.

McCONN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 81-2335.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 23, 1983.

Stephen D. Susman, William H. White, Charles J. Brink, Houston, Tex., Michael M. Barron, Austin, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Rufus Wallingford, Houston, Tex., for Hon. Jim McConn.

John L. Jeffers, Richard B. Miller, Houston, Tex., for Gulf Coast Cable.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

[1] ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[2] (Opinion March 17, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983,700 F.2d 226)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY POLITZ, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, JOLLYPage 26and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.^fn*

BY THE COURT:

[3] A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Judges Carolyn Dineen Randall and Will Garwood did not participate in the consideration of this order. ↩