Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Gonzalez

United States v. Gonzalez, 76 F.3d 1339 (5th Cir. 1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-01-29
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that a not guilty plea to “raises the issue of intent sufficiently to justify the admission of Rule 404(b) evidence”
  • holding that, in a conspiracy case, evidence defendant had been charged in a similar crime “raises the issue of intent sufficiently to justify the admission of Rule 404(b) evidence”
  • reviewing de novo denial of motion to dismiss indictment on double jeopardy grounds
  • “Because the PSR has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy, it may be considered ' as evidence by the trial court at sentencing.”
  • no double jeopardy in criminal prosecution where, prior to criminal conviction, no final administrative action nor other adjudication of civil liability had occurred in civil forfeiture proceeding
  • to convict for narcotics conspiracy, Government must prove existence of agreement - 4 - to violate drug-trafficking laws, defendant’s knowledge of agreement, and defendant’s voluntary participation in agreement

Citator

United States v. Gonzalez has been questioned or limited by later authorities: relies on overruled authority: 104 L. Ed. 2d 487 (overruled by Hudson v. United States). Read them before relying on it. 70 later decisions cite it.

Authority status
caution
Cited by
70 opinions
Distinguished
2 times

74 F.3d 620w

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joel GONZALEZ and Jose Francisco Gomez, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 94-60342.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 26, 1996.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION