Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 106 N.C. App. 493 (1992)

106 N.C. App. 493

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1992-01-01
Topic: general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 106 N.C. App. 493 (1992)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 16 June 1992 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 16 JUNE 1992 CARLTON v. CARLTON Durham Affirmed No. 9114DC594 (88CVD3120) COMBUSTION SYSTEMS Guilford No Error SALES v. HARRELSON (88CVS8603) MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS No. 9118SC599 CRUMPTON v. CRUMPTON Lenoir Affirmed in part No. 918DC467 (89CVD257) vacated remanded in part DRAKE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 106 N.C. App. 493 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,106 N.C. App. 493(1992)

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed 16 June 1992

FILED 16 JUNE 1992

CARLTON v. CARLTON Durham Affirmed No. 9114DC594 (88CVD3120)

COMBUSTION SYSTEMS Guilford No Error SALES v. HARRELSON (88CVS8603) MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS No. 9118SC599

CRUMPTON v. CRUMPTON Lenoir Affirmed in part No. 918DC467 (89CVD257) vacated remanded in part

DRAKE v. MABE Forsyth Affirmed No. 9121SC1035 (89CVS5844)

ELM ST. GALLERY v. Guilford Affirmed THE BUSINESS HUB (90CVD03127) No. 9118DC381

GERACI v. STATE RESIDENCE Guilford Reversed COMMITTEE OF U.N.C. (90CVS11251) No. 9118SC629

IN RE FORECLOSURE OF New Hanover Affirmed STEPPCHILD, INC. (90SP87) No. 915SC551

IN RE RIDDLE Haywood Affirmed No. 9130DC705 (89CVD760) (89CVD761) (89CVD762)

JOHNSON v. SIMS Forsyth Reversed No. 9121SC595 (89CVS2283) Remanded

McGINNIS v. LENTZ Cabarrus Reversed No. 9119SC374 (90CVS01669)

MURDOCK v. N.C. DEPT. OF Ind. Comm. Affirmed CORRECTION (TA-11390) No. 9110IC464

RAMSEY BROS., INC. v. Halifax Affirmed JOHN M. CAMPBELL CO. (89CVD891) No. 916DC726

STATE v. BELL Robeson No Error No. 9116SC269 (89CRS021133) (89CRS020928)Page 494

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩