Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 129 N.C. App. 646 (1998)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 129 N.C. App. 646 (1998), 129 N.C. App. 646 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1998-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 129 N.C. App. 646 (1998)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 19 May 1998 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 19 MAY 1998 (96CRS6905) (96CRS6906) SURRY COUNTY DSS Surry Affirmed v. STRICKLAND (94J131) No. 97-786 TAR HEEL HOME HEALTH, INC. Human Res. Affirmed v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 129 N.C. App. 646 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS,129 N.C. App. 646(1998)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 19 May 1998
FILED 19 MAY 1998
(96CRS6905) (96CRS6906)


SURRY COUNTY DSS Surry Affirmed v. STRICKLAND (94J131) No. 97-786

TAR HEEL HOME HEALTH, INC. Human Res. Affirmed v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN (96DHR0513) RESOURCES No. 97-742

WHITFIELD v. WESTERN Ind. Comm. Affirmed STEER OF N.C. (639675) No. 97-1069

WILLIAMS v. HUNTER Ind. Comm. Affirmed No. 97-607 (078492)

YARBROUGH v. CITY OF Alamance Affirmed BURLINGTON (96CVD2321) No. 97-620
FILED 2 JUNE 1998
AUSTIN v. LARGE ANIMAL Rowan Affirmed MED. SURGERY (94CVS2358) No. 97-949

BAREFOOT v. FINANCIAL Johnston Affirmed SERVS. OF RALEIGH, INC. (95CVS02002) No. 97-957

BECK v. ROBINSON Brunswick Affirmed No. 97-860 (96CVD273)

CATO v. HODGES Mecklenburg Affirmed No. 97-1464 (96CVS3836)

COSTELLO v. HOUSE OF Ind. Comm. Affirmed RAEFORD (369458) No. 97-799

EASTMOOR HOMEOWNERS Buncombe Affirmed ASS'N v. BARNWELL (95CVS2172) in part No. 97-856 Remanded in part

EDGE v. MELVIN MOTOR CO. Ind. Comm. Dismissed No. 97-1195 (517839)

FLETCHER v. NATIONWIDE Transylvania Affirmed INS. (94CVS454) in part No. 97-843 Reversed in part and RemandedPage 647
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩