Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel

Amoco Prod. Co. v. Hodel, 487 U.S. 1234 (1988)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-06-30
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that to defeat summary judgment, expert affidavits cannot involve "mere speculation or idiosyncratic opinion"
  • substantial segment of scientific community relies on animal studies in assessing health risks in humans
  • Testimony by experts as to causation lacked a sufficient foundation where the experts failed to take into account plaintiffs’ specific medical histories and habits; court also based its decision on the fact that the experts failed to rule out other possible causes.
  • expert opinions cannot involve "mere speculation or idiosyncratic opinion”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
112 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.