Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin

Cooper Elec. Supply Co. v. Martin, 503 U.S. 936 (1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-03-23
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • convening authority was not subject, to unlawful command influence through SECNAV policy guidance stating that national security cases should ordinarily be referred to trial by general court-martial
  • “defendant employer bears the ‘plain and substantial’ burden of proving he is entitled to discretionary relief from the FLSA’s mandatory liquidated damages provision.”
  • NPS’s failure to install ground wires on high-voltage power lines involved technical, economic and social considerations and was, therefore, protected by exception.
  • discontinuance of retired pay not subject to judicial review by military appellate courts

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
75 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.