Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ramires v. United States

Ramires v. United States, 525 U.S. 1112 (1999)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-01-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that district court judges have “wide latitude” under Confrontation Clause to “impose reasonable limits” on cross examination and limit “interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant”
  • “Juries are presumed to follow their instructions.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
  • "where there is substantial evidence of a defendant's participation in the conspiracy * * *, 'the significance of his withdrawal relates only to the * * * subsequent acts and declarations of coconspirators.' "

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ramires v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
70 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.