Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Dennis Wayne Cochran v. E.C. Morris D.R. Guillory, Warden R.W. Rowlette, Lieutenant John Doe, Physician Jane Doe, Food Service Manager
Dennis Wayne Cochran v. E.C. Morris D.R. Guillory, Warden R.W. Rowlette, Lieutenant John Doe, Physician Jane Doe, Food Serv. Manager, 46 F.3d 1123 (4th Cir. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-01-18
- Topic
- bankruptcy
46 F.3d 1123 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dennis Wayne COCHRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.C. MORRIS; D.R. Guillory, Warden; R.W.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dennis Wayne Cochran v. E.C. Morris D.R. Guillory, Warden R.W. Rowlette, Lieutenant John Doe, Physician Jane Doe, Food Service Manager. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis Wayne COCHRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.C. MORRIS; D.R. Guillory, Warden; R.W. Rowlette,
Lieutenant; John Doe, Physician; Jane Doe, Food
Service Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-6971.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
Decided Jan. 18, 1995.
Dennis Wayne Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.