Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Clifton
State v. Clifton, 357 N.C. 463 (N.C. 2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2003-08-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- one factor to consider when determining whether a sentence is grossly disproportionate is defendant's history of felony recidivism
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Clifton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
586 S.E.2d 266 (2003) 357 N.C. 463
STATE of North Carolina
No. 342P03.
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Alfred Dominique CLIFTON.
No. 342P03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
August 21, 2003.Alfred Dominique Clifton, Pro Se. *267 Stewart L. Johnson, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney Generals, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 580 S.E.2d 40.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st day of August 2003."