Worley v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

How later courts describe this case

• "[U]nless [the witness’s hearsay statements] qualify as 'testimonial,' Crawford is inapplicable and Roberts continues to apply.”
• SJC reasonably applied Strickland when it determined that counsel was not ineffective for failing to call several witnesses; upholding denial of habeas petition
• “The jury’s role as the finder of fact does not entitle it to return a verdict based only on confusion, speculation or prejudice-”